Python API · stjames models · API example
Calculate molecular orbitals, electron density, electrostatic potential, atomic charges, bond orders, and multipole moments to explore bonding and reactivity. This is a single-point calculation at the supplied geometry; it does not optimize the structure. Results depend on the geometry, molecular charge, spin multiplicity, and chosen method.
The electric dipole describes charge separation and is reported in Debye. Its vector points from negative toward positive charge, opposite the conventional chemistry dipole arrow. The quadrupole is a 3 × 3 tensor describing the second moment of the charge distribution. Components depend on the coordinate frame; for ions, the dipole also depends on the origin.
Mulliken and Löwdin charges partition the electron distribution differently. They are method- and basis-dependent estimates, rather than unique observable atomic charges. Compare trends using the same partitioning scheme and calculation settings.
Wiberg–Löwdin and Mayer indices summarize bonding between atom pairs. They can be fractional and depend on the electronic structure and definition; neither scheme is universally preferable or identical to formal bond order.
An isosurface joins points with the same value. Adjusting its cutoff changes the displayed shape and extent. Use the same cutoff when comparing surfaces across molecules.
Total electron density shows the electron cloud. Open-shell results also provide alpha and beta densities and their difference, the spin density. Color the total-density surface by electrostatic potential to inspect electrostatic interactions: negative potential attracts positive charge, while positive potential attracts negative charge. This is a qualitative guide, not a reaction prediction.
Orbital surfaces show positive and negative amplitudes, usually in different colors. These signs describe phase, not positive and negative charge; reversing an orbital’s overall sign changes no physical prediction. An orbital’s squared amplitude relates to probability density. The HOMO–LUMO energy gap is not itself an optical excitation energy.